Legal Opinion
Reichenbach v. Kraska Enterprises, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 29, 2008No. AC 26022PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Kraska Enterprises, LLC, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, granting a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, Stephen K. Reichen-bach, Ronald W. Kern, Ethel A. Kern, Curtis J. Knapper and Barbara K. Knapper. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied its motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, (2) enforced a stipulated judgment against it that had been entered in 1983 and (3) construed the terms of the stipulated judgment. We affirm the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rapoport v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS STAMFORDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Host America Corp. v. RamseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Zahringer v. ZahringerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Steroco, Inc. v. SzymanskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Town of Marlborough v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 818-052Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.