Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Vomacka

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1984No. S.F. 24672PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

Does a trial court have jurisdiction to extend spousal support payments past a date it has specified as the last opportunity the supported spouse may request such payments? Specifically, we are asked to determine whether the trial court in this case had jurisdiction to modify its interlocutory judgment of dissolution of the parties’ marriage to extend spousal support past September 1, 1984, pursuant to the following language of the interlocutory decree: “The Court shall retain jurisdiction regarding spousal support until September 1, 1984, at which time [wife’s] right to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe and Takeout III, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Pacific Valley Bank v. SchwenkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Cathay Bank v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Shade v. Co & Anglo Alaska Service Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API