Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An employee of Doyon Universal Services sustained a head injury while working at a pipeline pump station. She applied for and received workers' compensation benefits for the injury. She also brought a tort suit against Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, the operator of the pipeline pump station, alleging that its negligence was a proximate cause of her injuries. Alyeska sought summary judgment in the lawsuit, asserting that it was a statutory employer under the Alaska Workers' Compensation Act and thus was immune from suit. The superior court granted summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Grimm v. WagonerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Alaska Housing Finance Corp. v. SalvucciAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Mills v. HanklaAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Dixon v. BlackwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Marshall v. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.