Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2010No. S-13367PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An employee of Doyon Universal Services sustained a head injury while working at a pipeline pump station. She applied for and received workers' compensation benefits for the injury. She also brought a tort suit against Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, the operator of the pipeline pump station, alleging that its negligence was a proximate cause of her injuries. Alyeska sought summary judgment in the lawsuit, asserting that it was a statutory employer under the Alaska Workers' Compensation Act and thus was immune from suit. The superior court granted summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Grimm v. WagonerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Alaska Housing Finance Corp. v. SalvucciAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Mills v. HanklaAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Dixon v. BlackwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Marshall v. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API