Legal Opinion

Grimm v. Wagoner

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2003No. S-10953PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Statute 89.50.030(a) requires candidates for elected office to file disclosure statements containing an "accurate representation" of their financial affairs. State senate candidate Thomas Wagoner filed a disclosure statement that failed to disclose several actual or potential financial interests. Two voters filed a private post-election enforeement action under AS 39.50.100, claiming that AS 39.50.060(b) required Wagoner to forfeit the election. The superior court conducted a trial and held for Wagoner. We conclude that the superior court did not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Storrs v. State Medical BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Todd v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. DarrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Barnett v. BarnettAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. Planned Parenthood of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Nelson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API