Legal Opinion
State v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 15, 2008No. SC 17861PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this interlocutory public interest appeal is whether General Statutes § 35-32 (c) (2) 1 gives the plaintiff, the state of Connecticut (state), standing to pursue a parens patriae claim for damages to its general economy caused by violations of the Connecticut Antitrust Act (antitrust act), General Statutes § 35-24 et seq. The state appeals, upon the grant of its application filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-265a,* 2 from the order of the trial court dismissing its claim for damages to the state’s general economy against the defendants, the Marsh and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Weems v. Citigroup, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Brown and Brown, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.