Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Magna Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2009No. Docket 136542 and 136543PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, C. J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to determine the parties against whom attorney fees may be prorated under MCL 418.315(1). We conclude that the term “prorate” in MCL 418.315(1) applies only to employers and their insurance carriers. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case involves a dispute over workers’ compensation benefits. Plaintiff Rick Petersen began working *304for codefendant Koleasco, a trucking company, in February 1997. In March 1997, Koleasco hired codefendant BCN Transportation Services (BCN), a human…

2Cases cited168 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. CBOCS West, Inc. v. HumphriesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hamed v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API