Legal Opinion
Parker v. Brown
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 4, 1943No. 46PublishedCited by 1,692 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone
The questions for our consideration are whether the marketing program adopted for the 1940 raisin crop under the California Agricultural Prorate Act 1 is rendered invalid (1) by the Sherman Act, or (2) by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended, 7 U. S. C. §§ 601, et seq., or (3) by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
Appellee, a producer and packer of raisins in California, brought this suit in the district court to enjoin appellants— the State Director of Agriculture, Raisin Proration Zone No. 1, the members of the State Agricultural Prorate Advisory Commission and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,692 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
1,687 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.