Legal Opinion
City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 23, 1998No. 95-6234PublishedCited by 382 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
In the instant case, thirty-nine Alabama municipal entities brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, alleging that five defendant chemical companies engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices for repackaged chlorine in Alabama in violation of both federal and state antitrust law. The plaintiffs also asserted claims for fraud under Alabama law. In a memorandum opinion, the district court ruled much of the plaintiffs’ evidence inadmissible and granted summary judgment to all five defendants on the antitrust claims and the fraud…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by382 opinions
- Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. Florida Mowing & Landscape Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- In Re: Citric Acid Litigation 7-Up Bottling Co.Of Jasper Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Douglas C. Kilpatrick v. Breg, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Tuf Racing Products, Inc. v. American Suzuki Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
377 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.