Legal Opinion
Casserly v. City of Oakland
California Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14490PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, J., pro tem.
Petition for writ of mandate.
The applicant is the widow of one William Casserly, deceased. At the time of his death Casserly was a member of the Oakland fire department. His death was caused by broncho-pneumonia, which affliction was contracted in the performance of his duty as a fireman of such city on the sixth day of November, 1930, as the direct result of a fire drill participated in by him under orders from his superior officer. His death occurred on December 21st, following. Thereafter, petitioner herein duly filed an application before the Board of Trustees of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Brightman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dillard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- McKeag v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- HARDIN'S BAKERIES v. RanagerMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Brant v. Retirement Board of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.