Legal Opinion

Dillard v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1942No. L. A. 18221PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent city and the board of pension commissioners to place petitioner and her child on the pension rolls to which she claims she is entitled under the pension laws of the city by reason of her husband’s death. The facts are undisputed.

Petitioner’s husband, now deceased, was a regularly employed police officer of the city of Los Angeles. On the night of January 22, 1940, decedent, as a radio car patrolman, was on regular duty from 6 p. m. to 2 a. m.

At about 10:15 p. m. a suspect who was taken into…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API