Legal Opinion
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 17, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-680-JLLPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. (“Paine Webber”), commenced this litigation 1 seeking a declaratory judgment of patent invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement of United States Patent No. 4,346,442 (“the ’442 patent”) entitled “Securities Brokerage-Cash Management System” owned by defendant, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”). Merrill Lynch counterclaimed charging that Paine Webber’s cash management account known as RMA infringes the ’442 patent and has demanded a jury trial.
Two motions are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- In Re Howard SernakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Simon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Real v. Bunn-O-Matic Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.