Legal Opinion
Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 17, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-109-JRRPublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
This is an action for patent infringement. Plaintiff (“Willemijn”) alleges that products sold by Defendant (“Apollo”) infringe United States Patents 4,293,948 (the “ ’948 patent”) and Re. 31,852 (the “ ’852 reissue”). The patents at issue here relate to a data transmission system through a closed loop between master pulse equipment and subordinated terminal units.
The prosecution history in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) leading to the March 19, 1985, reissue of the ’948 patent spanned 17 years. The '948 patent issued on an…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Affymetrix, Inc. v. Synteni, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Kay v. National City Mortgage Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.