Legal Opinion
Real v. Bunn-O-Matic Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 25, 2000No. 99 C 3751PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Bryan Real (“Real” or “Plaintiff’) is the owner of a patent for a beverage dispensing machine, United States Patent No. 4,488,664 (“the ’664 patent”), and has filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant Bunn-O-Matic Corporation (“BunnO-Matic” or “Defendant”). Plaintiff alleges infringement of one patent by one product made by Bunn-O-Matic in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), (b) and (c). The Court conducted a Markman hearing and issued an opinion construing Claim 1 in the ’664 patent. Real v.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Howard A. Fromson v. Western Litho Plate and Supply Co. And Bemis Company, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Unisplay, S.A. v. American Electronic Sign Co., Inc., and Luke G. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Quantum Corporation and Plus Development Corporation v. Tandon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Simple.Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Senorx, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Brown v. ToscanoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Lam Research Corp. v. Schunk SemiconductorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. Espeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.