Higgins v. Kay
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
Dell M. Higgins was substituted as plaintiff in the above-entitled action by order of the superior court and notice of appeal served on her by the appellant, W. 0. Kay. She moves to dismiss the appeal as to herself.
A. E. Higgins, the original plaintiff, brought an action against Kay and others to quiet his title to an undivided one-fourth interest in a certain lot in the city of San Diego. Kay answered, asserting an interest in the land under an executory contract between himself and plaintiff, and also filed a cross-complaint under which he sought specific performance of this executory…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Walker v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Campbell v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hayes v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Almodovar v. Downey High School CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.