Emerson v. McWhirter
California Supreme Court
MOTION to allow substitution of transferee of respondent upon appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County and from an order denying a new trial. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In an action brought by the plaintiffs to have their title to certain mining property quieted as against defendant McWhirter, judgment was rendered in favor of Mc-Whirter, declaring him to be the owner and entitled to the possession of the ground, and forever enjoining the plaintiff from asserting any title thereto. This judgment was entered May 4, 1899, and on May 9th, McWhirter’s title to the ground became vested in the Tosemite Gold Mining Company (a corporation) by a conveyance from him. Proceedings in the superior court were thereafter continued between the original parties.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Culver v. RandleOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Fay v. SteubenrauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Higgins v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Waterbury v. ManganConnecticut Superior Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.