Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County, from an order denying a petition for the renewal of a motion to set aside a judgment, and from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment, and to have an action continued in the name of the grantee of the defendants. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose twenty-six laborers’ liens upon certain placer-mining property situate in Del Norte County, and owned by the Big Flat Gravel Mining Company. He alleged that he was the assignee of the claims, and prayed judgment for the sum of $6,644.94, the aggregate amount thereof, and $52 paid out for recording the liens, and $600 for attorneys’ fees, besides costs; and that the same be adjudged a lien upon the lands and premises described. A demurrer to the complaint was interposed and overruled, and an answer was then filed. After trial, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Plummer v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Moore v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.