Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Boothe

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1949No. Civ. 7486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is the third of a series of appeals arising out of the prior litigation between the same parties (see Erickson v. Boothe, 79 Cal.App.2d 266 [179 P.2d 611]; Erickson v. Boothe, * (Cal.App.) [203 P.2d 119],) to which reference is made for the background of this appeal.

On October 28, 1948, defendant Boothe filed a notice in the trial court for an order to compel Mazie Erickson, individually, as sole distributee of the estate of Timothy H. Garlon, deceased, to continue this action, and be bound as an individual by the judgment of the trial court entered on October 1, 1947, which judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Curtin v. SalomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Fay v. SteubenrauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Higgins v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Hollaway v. Scripps Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Wong v. Wong (In re Loy Tim), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Marriage of WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API