Hayes v. Pierce
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.
On December 20, 1935, defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff ’s amended complaint was overruled and defendants were given five days within which to aiiswer. On December 27, 1935, defendants having failed to file an answer, default was entered against them, and on January 7, 1936, a judgment was rendered thereon. On March 9, 1936, defendants served upon the plaintiff their notice of motion to set aside default and default judgment, together with an affidavit of merits and a showing of inadvertence and excusable neglect, as well as a proposed answer and cross-complaint. From said affidavit, it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Armstrong v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Higgins v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Aalwyn's Law Institute v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yarbrough v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Shively v. KochmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hayes v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.