Whitmore v. Bobst Group, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court are defendants’ motions to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to stay execution of or on any proceeding to enforce the judgment pursuant to Rule 62(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and plaintiff’s petition for delay damages pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 238.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TRACEY BY TRACEY v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Conway v. White Trucks, a Div. of White Motor Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- LaFountain v. Webb Industries Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.