Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUTTON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s (“UPS”) Motion for Summary Judgment, plaintiff John Burns’ (“Burns”) response, and UPS’s reply. For the following reasons, the defendant’s Motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Burns commenced this wrongful discharge action on December 8, 1989 arising out of the termination of his employment with UPS. Burns alleges that he was terminated in retaliation for filing a worker’s compensation claim and that said termination was in violation public policy. Burns seeks compensatory and punitive…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe v. William Shapiro, Esquire, P.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Buccilli v. Timby, Brown & TimbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- McLaughlin v. Gastrointestinal Specialists, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Murray v. Gencorp, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Almeida v. United Steelworkers of America International UnionDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.