Legal Opinion

Ray v. Alad Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1977No. L.A. 30613PublishedCited by 370 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, J. *

Claiming damages for injury from a defective ladder, plaintiff asserts strict tort liability against defendant Alad Corporation (Alad II) which neither manufactured nor sold the ladder but prior to plaintiff’s injury succeeded to the business of the ladder’s manufacturer, the now dissolved “Alad Corporation” (Alad I), through a purchase of Alad I’s assets for an adequate cash considerátion. Upon acquiring Alad Fs plant, equipment, inventory, trade name, and good will, Alad II continued to manufacture the same Une of ladders under the “Alad” name, using the same equipment,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by370 opinions

  1. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. In Re Savage Industries, Inc., Debtor. Western Auto Supply Company v. Savage Arms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

365 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API