Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1981PublishedCited by 243 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

This products liability case implicates principles of successor corporation liability. We are called upon to formulate a general rule governing the strict tort liability of a successor corporation for damages caused by defects in products manufactured and distributed by its predecessor. The Appellate Division, in an opinion reported at 171 N.J.Super. 261 (1979), devised the following test, based essentially on the holding of the Supreme Court of California in Ray v. Alad Corp., 19 Cal.3d 22, 560 P.2d 3, 136 Cal.Rptr. 574 (1977):

[W]here, as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by243 opinions

  1. Patricia Thompson v. Real Estate Mortgage NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. Elbie Mozingo, Cross-Appellee v. Correct Manufacturing Corporation and G.W. Way, Correct Manufacturing Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API