Legal Opinion
Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1998No. E018614PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
Tudor Ranches, Inc. (Tudor) stipulated to judgment in favor of State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) in order to seek immediate appellate review of numerous in limine rulings. While we conclude the judgment is appealable, on the record before us we cannot conclude the court abused its discretion in making the rulings. Accordingly, we affirm.
I
Factual and Procedural Background
A. Nature of the Present Dispute
SCIF is a public enterprise fund created for the purpose of transacting workers’ compensation insurance. (Ins. Code, §§ 11770, 11773.) It was established to ensure that…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Atkinson v. Elk Corp. of TexasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- HOVEIDA v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of South San Francisco v. MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998