Legal Opinion
City of South San Francisco v. Mayer
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1998No. A081531PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, Acting P. J.—
I. Introduction
This appeal involves the question of whether respondent City of South San Francisco (City) must, in its condemnation action, compensate appellants Josephine Anne Mayer and Estate of Erwin Mayer (appellants) for the value of the City’s preexisting leasehold interest in Mayer’s property. Like the trial court, we answer this question in the negative and, therefore, affirm the judgment.
II. Factual and Procedural Background
The property around which this appeal centers is the South San Francisco Conference Center, located in the City of South San…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Building Industry Assn. of Southern California, Inc. v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- City of Glendale v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. 1.377 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- City of Palm Springs v. Living Desert ReserveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- United States v. 1.377 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, Situated In The City Of San Diego, County Of San Diego, State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003