Legal Opinion

Williams v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 28, 1964No. 41002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Plaintiff, Leota M. Williams, initiated this original action seeking a writ of prohibition directed to defendant W. Lee Johnson, Judge of the District Court of Tulsa County. The real object of the proceeding is to challenge the constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 267 of the Twenty-ninth Oklahoma Legislature (20 O.S.1963 Supp. §§ 951-966). There is no question but that this Act was not treated, published nor passed as the Constitution requires in the case of a local or special law.

The defendant does not oppose plaintiff’s request that this Court assume jurisdiction. Due to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Haas v. HollomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Key v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Hudgins v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Wilkinson v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Estate of Frothingham v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. Crawford v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API