Legal Opinion
Haas v. Holloman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 8, 1958No. 38096PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by the Court Clerk of Tillman County, Oklahoma, from a judgment of the district court of said County, wherein a writ of mandamus was issued to the court clerk directing him, under the authority of House Bill No. 960, Laws 1957, p. 104, to make the monthly payments therein provided to the County Judge.
The District Court in said judgment made a finding that House Bill 960 of the Twenty-sixth Legislature is constitutional and that it is a general bill as defined by the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma.
As against that decision it is asserted that H.B.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daily Leader v. Cameron, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Wade v. Board of Com'rs of Harmon CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- State ex rel. Douglas v. RittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Key v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Application of GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Black v. Ball Janitorial Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.