Legal Opinion
Hudgins v. Foster
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 10, 1928No. 18435PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
This action was begun by the board of county commissioners of Creek county, Okla., against the defendants, constituting the board of trustees of Sapulpa township, Creek county, Okla., in which the plaintiff sought by writ of mandamus to compel the latter board to turn over to the county clerk its files, books, records, accounts, money, etc., as provided by chapter 107, Session Laws 1927. Judgment was rendered by the district court in favor of the plaintiff, and the township board appeals.
The only question submitted to us upon review is whether House Bill No. 355, approved March 19, 1927, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daily Leader v. Cameron, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Jacobs Ranch, L.L.C. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.