Legal Opinion

LeRoy v. Allen, Yurasek & Merklin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2007No. Nos. 2005-1593 and 2005-1926PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal presents two distinct issues involving whether a complaint in a legal-malpractice action filed by plaintiffs who are outside the attorney-client relationship states cognizable claims. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the complaint under consideration does state valid claims, but under only one of the two grounds endorsed by the court of appeals. Consequently, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the court of appeals.

Background

{¶ 2} Mary Elizabeth Behrens died on May 1, 2002. Mary Elizabeth Behrens was the matriarch of the Behrens family and had been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Scholler v. SchollerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Simon v. ZippersteinOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. ISHA, Inc. v. RisserOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Grey v. Walgreen Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Davis v. WidmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Cline v. Mtge. Electronic Registration Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API