Stogner v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
California has brought a criminal prosecution after expiration of the time periods set forth in previously applicable statutes of limitations. California has done so under the authority of a new law that (1) permits resurrection of otherwise time-barred criminal prosecutions, and (2) was itself enacted after pre-existing limitations periods had expired. We conclude that the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, Art. I, §10, cl. 1, bars application of this new law to the present case.
I
In 1993, California enacted a new criminal statute of limitations governing sex-related child abuse crimes. The…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by291 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.