Legal Opinion

Stogner v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 2003No. 01-1757PublishedCited by 291 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

California has brought a criminal prosecution after expiration of the time periods set forth in previously applicable statutes of limitations. California has done so under the authority of a new law that (1) permits resurrection of otherwise time-barred criminal prosecutions, and (2) was itself enacted after pre-existing limitations periods had expired. We conclude that the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, Art. I, §10, cl. 1, bars application of this new law to the present case.

I

In 1993, California enacted a new criminal statute of limitations governing sex-related child abuse crimes. The…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by291 opinions

  1. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004

286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API