Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Crusoe

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 26, 1954No. 2780PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BR0SMAN, Judge:

Together with three companions whose appeals are not before us, the accused was found guilty by an Army general court-martial under a single specification alleging attempted larceny, and two specifications of conspiracy— in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Articles 80, 81, 50 USC §§ 674, 675, respectively. The accused was sentenced to receive a dishonorable discharge, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be confined at hard labor for five years — the most severe of the three sentences imposed. The convening authority approved…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. KeithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. YarboroughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. McCormickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. CooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. LanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. PosnickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. DandaneauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. OakleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. BestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API