Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Yarborough

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 12, 1952No. 443PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Petitioners Marshall and Yarborough were each convicted, at common trial by general court-martial in Korea, of conspiracy to malinger; malingering; and misbehavior before the enemy. Each was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement for ten years. Army reviewing authorities have upheld the findings and sentence, including the board of review which affirmed without opinion. We granted petition for review limited to the issues of whether there is sufficient evidence to support the findings and whether there is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. HolteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. HeflinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. PosnickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. BeeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. CrusoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API