Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Briggs
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
RESPONDENTS’ APPEAL.
Each of respondents’ assignments of error has received careful consideration. Conceding there may be technical error in certain of the court’s rulings with reference to the admissibility of evidence, a careful reading of the evidence fails to show respondents were prejudiced thereby. Upon the entire record, we find no error of such nature as to justify a new trial.
PETITIONER’S APPEAL.
On June 8, 1962, petitioner paid into the office of the clerk of the superior court the sum of $6,975.00, the amount of damages assessed by the commissioners. Thereby petitioner acquired the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. York Industrial Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Topping v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- City of Winston-Salem v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- City of Kings Mountain v. GoforthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Duke Power Co. v. WinebargerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. IrvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Greenville City Board of Education v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.