North Carolina State Highway Commission v. York Industrial Center, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The only question for decision is the right of plaintiff to have the action dismissed. In support of that right, it points to G.S. 1-209.2, which says: “The petitioner in all condemnation proceedings authorized by G.S. 40-2 or by any other statute is authorized and allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit.”
The statute on which plaintiff relies was enacted in 1957. Needless to say, it should not be interpreted in such manner as to render it unconstitutional, if a reasonable constitutional interpretation can be given.
The right of a petitioner in a condemnation proceeding to submit to a voluntary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Snow v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Liverman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Topping v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Whiting Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Chateau X, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- City of Durham v. MansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Hughes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- City of Kings Mountain v. GoforthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.