City of Winston-Salem v. Wells
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The only questions presented by this appeal are whether the respondents are entitled to interest; and, if so, on what amount, and from what date. The petitioner deposited in the clerk’s office $2,860 for the property taken. The respondents objected on the ground the deposit was inadequate. Subsequent trial and judgment sustained their contention and fixed the amount of just compensation at $10,000. The respondents could not have accepted the deposit without exposing themselves to the charge that they had settled the controversy. “True, ihe respondent was not obligated to accept the amount,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PardingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- City of Kings Mountain v. GoforthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Associated Enterprises v. TOLTEC WATERSHEDWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Duke Power Co. v. WinebargerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.