Legal Opinion

Greenville City Board of Education v. Evans

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1974No. 743SC229PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

We cannot sustain respondents’ argument that the Board of County Commissioners should have been joined as a necessary party. The motion was made on the ground that no funds may be expended for a school site without its approval. G.S. 115-78(c) (1) provides in pertinent part:

“ ... no contract for the purchase of the site shall be executed nor any funds expended therefor without the approval of the board of county commissioners as to the amount to be spent for the site; and in case of a disagreement between a board of education and a board of county commissioners as to the amount…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vance County v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State Highway Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API