Duke Power Co. v. Winebarger
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Respondents first assign error to the admission, over objection, of questions propounded on cross-examination of respondents’ expert witness. The following appears in the record:
“Q. Let me ask you this, do you know anything of a 225.4 acre sale made by Johnson J. Hayes, Jr., to John and Joy Payne in November 1976?
A. No. As I stated I did not base any appraisal on any comparable.
Q. You don’t know that property sold for $148.00 an acre, do you?
A. No, sir.
Mr. Smith objects. Overruled.
Exception No. 4
Q. You don’t know that sold for $148.00 an acre?
A. No, I do not.
Q. How about…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Carver v. LykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. IrvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- GREENSBORO-HIGH POINT AIRPORT AUTH. v. IrvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982