Legal Opinion

Duke Power Co. v. Winebarger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1979No. 7823SC731PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Respondents first assign error to the admission, over objection, of questions propounded on cross-examination of respondents’ expert witness. The following appears in the record:

“Q. Let me ask you this, do you know anything of a 225.4 acre sale made by Johnson J. Hayes, Jr., to John and Joy Payne in November 1976?

A. No. As I stated I did not base any appraisal on any comparable.

Q. You don’t know that property sold for $148.00 an acre, do you?

A. No, sir.

Mr. Smith objects. Overruled.

Exception No. 4

Q. You don’t know that sold for $148.00 an acre?

A. No, I do not.

Q. How about…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Carver v. LykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. IrvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. GREENSBORO-HIGH POINT AIRPORT AUTH. v. IrvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API