M & R Investment Co. v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*447OPINION
By the Court,
Springer, J.:
This action, tried before a jury, was brought by the State of Nevada (State) seeking to condemn property owned by M & R Investment Company (M & R).
The State’s eminent domain action was intended to obtain approximately fourteen acres of M & R’s twenty-seven-acre parcel of property for the expansion of the 1-15 interchange at Flamingo Road in Las Vegas. The twenty-seven acres is situated on the west side of 1-15. The Dunes Hotel, also owned by M & R, is on the east side of 1-15 directly across from the property at issue. Contemporaneously with the filing of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Baetjer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- City of Stockton v. VoteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Doolittle v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Miller v. PreisserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- City of San Diego v. NeumannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- City of San Diego v. NeumannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.