Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. Neumann
California Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1993No. S029018PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
6 Cal.4th 738 (1993)
863 P.2d 725
25 Cal. Rptr.2d 480
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
FRITZ NEUMANN et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Docket No. S029018.
Supreme Court of California.
December 20, 1993.
COUNSEL
Asaro & Keagy, Roscoe D. Keagy, Richard R. Freeland, Arnold Neves, Jr., Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Gideon Kanner and M. Reed Hunter for Defendants and Appellants.
Berger & Norton and Michael M. Berger as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.
John W. Witt, City Attorney, C. Alan Sumption, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Leslie J. Girard and Linda Bartz Kinsey, Deputy…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Perris v. StamperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Perris v. StamperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016