Legal Opinion

City of Stockton v. Vote

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1926No. Docket No. 3010PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Pursuant to certain resolutions passed by the city council of the City of Stockton and the affirmative result of an election participated in by the qualified electors of the City of Stockton, the plaintiff in this action proposes to erect a restraining dam, or a dam to control the flood waters of the Calaveras River at a point on said stream in the county of Calaveras about three miles from the town of Valley Springs. The defendant in this action is the owner of a tract of land lying easterly of the site of the proposed restraining dam and a portion of whose land lies within the basin that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API