Miller v. Preisser
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
This appeal in an eminent domain action raises questions of law regarding (1) the application of the assemblage doctrine as a theory of valuation, (2) whether a change of traffic patterns is a compensable taking, and (3) whether a court in an eminent domain action has subject matter jurisdiction over a claim that the government’s exercise of its police power to regulate traffic was unreasonable.
As to the first issue, the district court ruled the landowners could not present evidence related to the doctrine of assemblage, which is a theory…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schliem v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2023
- Doug Garber Construction, Inc. v. King – Stegall – AffirmedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
- Schliem v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016