Legal Opinion
ATC Partnership v. Town of Windham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 20, 2004No. SC 16858; SC 16859PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The defendants1 appeal, following our grants of certification,2 from the judgment of the Appel*465late Court reversing the trial court’s judgment, which was rendered after a bench trial, in favor of the defendants. The defendants claim that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determination that the plaintiff could not maintain an action for statutory replevin, brought pursuant to General Statutes § 52-515,3 because the plaintiff was seeking to recover property properly characterized as fixtures…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Dimartino v. RichensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Capen v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- ATC Partnership v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- 98 Lords Highway, LLC v. One Hundred Lords Highway, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.