Legal Opinion

ATC Partnership v. Town of Windham

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 14, 1999No. SC 16173PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

This case concerns the extent to which constitutional principles of substantive due process, *599under the federal constitution or under our state constitution, permit a property owner to pursue an action for damages premised on a claim of intentional abuse of a municipality’s power of eminent domain. The plaintiff property owner claims that it is entitled to recover for the wilful, arbitrary and capricious seizure and condemnation of its property, in furtherance of a municipality’s intent to usurp an opportunity for economic development of the property. The question before us is…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Lopez v. SmileyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  4. Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Gothberg v. Town of PlainvilleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API