ATC Partnership v. Town of Windham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This case concerns the extent to which constitutional principles of substantive due process, *599under the federal constitution or under our state constitution, permit a property owner to pursue an action for damages premised on a claim of intentional abuse of a municipality’s power of eminent domain. The plaintiff property owner claims that it is entitled to recover for the wilful, arbitrary and capricious seizure and condemnation of its property, in furtherance of a municipality’s intent to usurp an opportunity for economic development of the property. The question before us is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Lopez v. SmileyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Gothberg v. Town of PlainvilleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.