Legal Opinion
Dimartino v. Richens
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 27, 2003No. SC 16818PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The defendants, Mark Richens, Kenneth J. Robert, Robert Carterud and the department of transportation of the state of Connecticut (department), appeal1 from the judgment of the trial court rendered for the plaintiff, Francisco DiMartmo, on: (1) a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the alleged violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983,2 concerning his rights to freedom of speech and equal protection of the laws, as guaranteed by the first and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution; and (2) the trial court’s findings that the defendants had violated General…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. BuhlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. DeloretoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.