Legal Opinion
Wastvedt v. Vaaler
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1988No. Civ. 870344PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
The plaintiffs, Gilman Wastvedt, Osten H. Pladson, James N. Kent, Ethel B. Kent, H.M. (Herb) Nash, Emelia R. Nash, Theodore Huus, Alpha Huus, and Harley Nash, appeal from a judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict which set aside a $168,185.63 verdict in their legal malpractice action against the defendants, Robert Vaaler and Vaaler, Gillig, Warcup, Woutat, Zimney & Foster, Chartered, a professional corporation. We affirm.
The plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claim centers on the January 8,1982 sale of their majority ownership of the Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Hatton…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hughes v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Holmgren v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Heimer v. PrivratskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.