Bottle Mining and Milling Co. v. Kern
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This appeal comes to this court by transfer from the supreme court. The appeal was taken to that court on the theory that the “assessment,” the validity of which is attacked, was such as to give that court appellate jurisdiction in the case. (154 Cal. 96, [97 Pac. 25].)
The action was brought by the plaintiff corporation to recover from the defendant, who is the holder of 50,000 shares of its capital stock, the sum of $350, the unpaid balance of an assessment levied upon such shares of stock. At the time said assessment was levied 462,000 out of its 500,000 shares of stock, of the par value of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santa Cruz Railroad v. SprecklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People's Home Sav. Bank v. StadtmullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Bell v. Standard Quicksilver Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- In re South Mountain Consolidated Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Watson v. Santa Carmelita Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bourdieu v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Wood v. HamaguchiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Farbstein v. Pacific Oil Tool Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- More v. Courier-NewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.