Legal Opinion

Farbstein v. Pacific Oil Tool Co., Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1932No. Docket No. 4573PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The trial court sustained the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s third amended complaint without leave to amend. From the judgment entered thereafter the plaintiff appeals.

The action was originally begun by Della Greenberg, a stockholder in the defendant corporation, by a complaint filed December 13, 1929, in which it was sought to enjoin the sale of the stock belonging to the plaintiff for the failure to pay an assessment levied thereon, and also to have the assessment declared void. After the decease of Della Greenberg, J. Farbstein, the administrator of her estate, was substituted as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGowan v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Lum v. American Wheel & Vehicle Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Consumers Salt Co. v. RigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Balfour-Guthrie Investment Co. v. WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schroeter v. Bartlett Syndicate Building Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. DeMello v. Dairyman's Cooperative CreameryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Haro v. IbarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API