Legal Opinion

Bell v. Standard Quicksilver Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1905No. S.F. No. 3416PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The object of the action was to obtain a decree declaring invalid an assessment of less than ten per cent upon the stock of the defendant corporation, and to set aside a sale under said assessment of seventeen thousand shares of the stock belonging to the estate of the deceased. The case was tried by the court, findings were filed, and judgment was entered for the defendant.

The principal point relied on by the plaintiff is, that the assessment is void for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Granger v. Original Empire Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. College National Bank v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Seal of Gold Mining Co. v. SlaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Angelis v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Bottle Mining and Milling Co. v. KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API