Legal Opinion

Bourdieu v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1935No. Civ. 1377PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to approximately 820 acres of land in Fresno County. The defendants set up a claim to the land under an option to purchase the same, which reads as follows:

‘ ‘ Coalinga, California,

“October first, A. D. 1928.
“Received of Hans R. Sumpf the sum of ten dollars, as part payment for the following described real property situate County of Fresno, State of California (description). The entire price to be paid for said above described real property is $25,000.—(twenty-five thousand dollars), and to be paid as follows:
“$3000.—on or before thirty days…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. California Land Security Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Lambert v. GernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Four Oil Co. v. United Oil ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gaffney v. Downey Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. McCall v. CarlsonNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Humbert v. Castro Valley County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Collins v. Marvel Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Callisch v. FarnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API