Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Insurance v. Hardin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 8316SC394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends for the first time on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motions for directed verdict made at the close of plaintiffs evidence and again at the close of all the evidence in that plaintiffs insureds’ failure to obtain a building permit constituted negligence per se. We consider this contention since it was litigated by consent at trial as contemplated by Rule 15(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 15(b) provides that “[w]hen issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by the express or implied consent of the parties, they…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Bell v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Matter of UserySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Sullivan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. McNair v. BoyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. PARKER BLDG. SERVICES CO., INC. v. LightseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Driggers v. Sofamor, S.N.C.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  4. Hinnant v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. McNeill v. Durham County ABC BoardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API