Legal Opinion

McNair v. Boyette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 7210SC298PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Boyette.

While it is conceded that summary judgment will not be as feasible in negligence cases, where the standard of the prudent man must be applied, as it would in other cases, summary judgment is proper where it appears that there can be no recovery even if the facts as claimed by plaintiff are true. Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425 (1970). When the facts are admitted or established, negligence is a question of law and the court must say whether it does or does…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Hillman v. United States Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Federated Mutual Insurance v. HardinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Goode v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Pintacuda v. ZuckebergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API